Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Dagsvik, John K.
Strøm, Steinar
Locatelli, Marilena
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper 4591
Dagsvik and Karlström (2005) have demonstrated how one can compute Compensating Variation and Compensated Choice Probabilities by means of analytic formulas in the context of discrete choice models. In this paper we offer a new and simplified derivation of the compensated probabilities. Subsequently, we discuss the application of this methodology to compute compensated labor supply responses (elasticities) in a particular discrete choice labor supply model. Whereas the Slutsky equation holds in the case of the standard microeconomic model with deterministic preferences, this is not so in the case of random utility models. When the non-labor income elasticity is negative the Slutsky equation implies that the compensated wage elasticity is higher than the uncompensated one. In contrast, in our random utility model we show empirically that in a majority of cases the uncompensated wage elasticity is in fact the highest one. We also show that when only the deterministic part of the utility function is employed to yield optimal hours and related elasticities, these elasticities are numerically much higher and decline more sharply across deciles than the random utility ones.
female labor supply
compensated discrete choice
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.