Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/67966
Authors: 
Montero, Maria
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
CeDEx Discussion Paper, The University of Nottingham 2008-03
Abstract: 
This paper extends the Baron-Ferejohn model of legislative bargaining to general weighted majority games with two modifications: first, payoff division can only be agreed upon after the coalition has formed (two-stage bargaining); second, negotiations in the coalition can break down, in which case a new coalition may be formed (reversible coalitions). Under the most natural bargaining protocol, both expected payoffs and actual payoff division are proportional to the voting weights provided that the set of winning coalitions of minimum weight is weakly balanced and that the breakdown probability tends to 0. Homogeneity of the voting weights is neither necessary nor sufficient for proportional payoffs. Intermediate values of the breakdown probability produce predictions consistent with the empirical evidence on portfolio allocation in Europe: a moderate propoper advantage and a linear relationship between weights and ex post payoffs for all coalition members other than the proposer.
Subjects: 
coalition formation
legislative bargaining
weighted majority games
proportional payoffs
reversible coalitions
JEL: 
C71
C72
C78
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
324.29 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.