Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/342105 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2026
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] European Economic Review [ISSN:] 1873-572X [Volume:] 188 [Article No.:] 105415 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2026 [Pages:] 1-12
Verlag: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zusammenfassung: 
Transactions such as kidney sales or surrogacy often evoke repugnance among unaffected observers (spectators). We examine whether individuals directly involved in these transactions (stakeholders) are more accepting. In our lab experiment featuring a transaction with severe consequences and limited agency for the vulnerable party, spectators and vulnerable stakeholders largely deem it repugnant, whereas advantaged stakeholders (who have the right to make offers) are less likely to prohibit it. Spectators and vulnerable stakeholders differentiate between mild and severe outcomes, while advantaged stakeholders are accepting in both cases. All groups are more prohibitive when agency is lacking. Overall, spectators mostly align with the vulnerable, while advantaged stakeholders view the transactions more favorably.
Schlagwörter: 
Repugnance
Stakeholders
Spectators
Agency
Paternalism
JEL: 
C72
C92
D83
D84
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.