Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/319867 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice [ISSN:] 1540-6520 [Volume:] 48 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] Sage [Place:] Thousand Oaks, CA [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 1082-1109
Verlag: 
Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Zusammenfassung: 
Intuition is a central element of entrepreneurial decision-making. We conceptually replicate a published study by using new representative data from 1961 adults and the widely used Cognitive Reflection Test, which assesses the ability to avoid intuitive decisions and to switch to an analytical process. We extend the analysis by exploring occupational sorting versus environmental influence as mechanisms, the role of overconfidence, and heterogeneity. Our results confirm that entrepreneurs do not resist intuitive (but potentially wrong) decisions as much as hired managers do. Our extensions suggest that this difference is not fully explained by occupational sorting, but partially by overconfidence.
Schlagwörter: 
entrepreneurs
managers
cognitive reflection
intuition
overconfidence
personality
JEL: 
L26
D91
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.