Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/313537 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Citation: 
[Journal:] Review of Policy Research [ISSN:] 1541-1338 [Issue:] Early View [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Oxford [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 1-28
Publisher: 
Wiley, Oxford
Abstract: 
Narratives play an essential role in fast‐paced policy making that occurs during crises. The COVID‐19 pandemic brought numerous disruptions of normality, including school closures, which were intensely debated in narratives by many policy actors. Two shutdowns of New York City's public school system affected over 1.1 million students. This article investigates how scientific evidence was used in the narratives surrounding the school shutdowns in NYC by analyzing around 160 policy narratives with the Narrative Policy Framework. We ask whether and how the growing certainty of evidence on the new Coronavirus was reflected in the policy narratives in the second compared to the first shutdown. While there is increased use of scientific evidence in the second shutdown stage, this does not reflect an increased evidence base: The evolving use of evidence in policy narratives is mainly reflected in its strategic uses to support a certain policy solution within a blame‐avoidance strategy.
Subjects: 
COVID-19
crisis
evidence
Narrative Policy Framework
school shutdown
uncertainty
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.