Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/312552 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] West European Politics [ISSN:] 1743-9655 [Volume:] 48 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Taylor & Francis [Place:] London [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 618-644
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis, London
Abstract: 
Political parties address the public through multiple communication channels simultaneously, but this is not reflected in contemporary research. It is largely unclear how party competition plays out across different communication channels and whether issue salience strategies depend on the channel used. In order to answer this question, this article trains a state-of-the-art language model (BERT) on labelled manifestos and applies it for cross-domain topic classification of press releases, parliamentary speeches and tweets from parties and individual party members in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. The results show that certain channel characteristics influence parties’ issue salience. The extent to which a party addresses its issue preferences (ideal agenda) is moderated by the degree of centralised communication (party vs. individuals) and the presence or absence of a pre-given agenda, whereas a channel’s primary audience (direct vs. mediated channel) plays a much smaller role than expected. These findings illustrate the complexity of party competition in contemporary multi-channel and hybrid media environments.
Subjects: 
Party competition
issue salience
communication channels
cross-domain topic classification
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.