Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/271917 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 10273
Publisher: 
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich
Abstract: 
There have been criticisms of debt sustainability analysis in general, including the IMF's own evaluation of the usefulness of its debt sustainability methodology (e.g., IMF, 2017). This paper's focus is narrow. On the basis of theoretical arguments and empirical evidence, it argues that the debt-to-GDP ratio is a poor metric for debt management in low-income countries (LICs). It makes a case for explicit revenue-based metrics of debt management. In LICs or countries with weak institutions, the debt-to-GDP may be manipulated by understating the stock of debt, resorting to dubious accounting methods, and there is a weak correlation between GDP and revenue as result of inefficiencies in the tax administration and a large informal sector. It is also arelatively inefficient predictor of debt distress. Other reasons are given in the paper.
Subjects: 
debt-to-GDP ratio. debt service-to-revenue ratio
debt sustainability
liquidity
solvency
JEL: 
H63
E62
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.