Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/209701 
Year of Publication: 
2014
Citation: 
[Journal:] Comparative Political Studies [ISSN:] 1552-3829 [Volume:] 47 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] Sage [Place:] Thousand Oaks, CA [Year:] 2014 [Pages:] 631-658
Publisher: 
Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Abstract: 
Social movement scholars have struggled with the question how abstract political opportunities affect activists without much knowledge of politics. We argue that the relationship between institutional opportunities and mobilization may take the form of trickle-down politics. In this view, activists are affected by political opportunities indirectly through the changes that political developments bring about in the immediate setting of protest. The political climate determines the distance between general public opinion and activists’ view on society. The smaller this distance, the more likely it becomes that activists receive positive feedback, which results in further mobilization. We investigate how activists are influenced by bystander responses that are evoked by the wider political context. Statistical models indeed indicate that spatiotemporal fluctuations in political opportunities and public sentiments are translated into mobilization after activists receive feedback from bystanders. This suggests that bystander responses play a crucial role in linking political opportunities to mobilization.
Subjects: 
ethnic violence
social movements
opportunity structures
structure-agency debates
Germany
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.