Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/190841 
Year of Publication: 
2017
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics [ISSN:] 2214-8043 [Volume:] 66 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2017 [Pages:] 104-111
Publisher: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Abstract: 
Multiple sources of funding are becoming increasingly important for charitable organizations. Donations from corporate donors for example account for 25–35% of charitable income for the largest US charities, across charitable sectors. This note presents some tentative first evidence from a natural field experiment to shed light on how different types of potential donors: individuals, corporates and aristocratically titled individuals, respond to the same fundraising drive. Each donor type was randomly assigned to treatments varying in two dimensions: (i) whether information was conveyed about the existence of an anonymous lead donor, and (ii) how individual donations would be matched by the anonymous lead donor. We find that aristocrats are significantly more likely to respond and that corporates give significantly more than individuals. Treatment effects moreover suggest that (proportional) matching is to be avoided for corporate donors.
Subjects: 
agency problems
charitable giving
corporate donors
aristocratic donors
field experiment
JEL: 
C93
D12
D64
Published Version’s DOI: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.