Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/96990
Authors: 
Testa, Maria Rita
Cavalli, Laura
Rosina, Alessandro
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers 7/2012
Abstract: 
Most of the international studies on fertility are based on a female perspective. A major difficulty in couple-level research is the need for high-quality data that includes information on both partners. Using couple data from a longitudinal study conducted in Italy [2003-2007], a country with persistently low fertility levels, we examined the effect of disagreement within a couple about childbearing behaviour. The starting point was the hypothesis advanced in an earlier study that Italian women prevail in reproductive decision-making, because childbearing lies mainly in their sphere of influence. The data revealed that the decision rules are parityspecific. At parities zero and one, the disagreement produced an intermediate childbearing outcome irrespective of which partner wanted a(nother) child; while at higher parities, an asymmetrical veto power model in which the female partner had greater influence was observed. The findings suggest that the predictive power of short-term fertility intentions strongly improves if both partners' views are considered in fertility models, and thus support the adoption of couple analysis in fertility research.
Subjects: 
Fertility decision-making
reproductive behaviour
couple disagreement
childbearing intentions
child-timing intentions
partner context
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.