Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/93431
Authors: 
Demange, Gabrielle
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper 4636
Abstract: 
Ranking methods are fundamental tools in many areas. Popular methods aggregate the statements of experts' in different ways. As such, there are various reasonable ranking methods, each one of them more or less adapted to the environment under consideration. This paper introduces a new method, called the handicap-based method, and characterizes it through appealing properties. This method assigns not only scores to the items but also weights to the experts. Scores and weights form an equilibrium for a relationship based on the notion of handicaps. The method is, in a sense made precise in the paper, the counterpart to the counting method in environments that require intensity-invariance. Intensity-invariance is a desirable property when the intensity of the experts' statements has to be controlled. Otherwise, both the counting and handicap-based methods satisfy a property called homogeneity, which is a desirable property when cardinal statements matter, as is the case in many applications. The method is illustrated for ranking economic journals.
Subjects: 
ranking
scores
invariant method
peers' method
handicap
scaling matrix
JEL: 
D71
D89
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.