Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80146
Authors: 
Ertan, Arhan
Page, Talbot
Putterman, Louis
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper, Brown University, Department of Economics 2005-13
Abstract: 
Previous experiments on public goods dilemmas have found that the opportunity to punish leads to higher contributions and reduces the free rider problem; however, a substantial amount of punishment is targeted on high contributors. In the experiment reported here, subjects are given the opportunity to vote on rules governing punishment. We found that, from their first opportunity to vote, no group ever allowed punishment of high contributors, most groups eventually voted to allow punishment of low contributors, and a minority of groups never allowed any form of punishment. Groups allowing punishment of low but not high contributors had significantly higher efficiency and contributions than comparison groups with unrestricted punishment.
Subjects: 
Public goods
collective action
punishment
voting
institutions
JEL: 
C91
C92
D71
H41
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.