Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/67727 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2010
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Queen's Economics Department Working Paper No. 1274
Verlag: 
Queen's University, Department of Economics, Kingston (Ontario)
Zusammenfassung: 
Commodity price volatility is bad for macroeconomic performance. Virtually all empirical studies that document this negative relationship rely on the estimation of aggregate growth equations using cross-section evidence drawn from the post-1970 era. This paper uses a simulation model based on the structure of a dynamic renewable resource model of optimal extraction to determine why commodity price volatility affects investment decisions, production levels, profitability, and ultimately long run growth. The Canadian forestry sector is used as a case study to assess the relative strength of each of these effects. Simulation exercises reveal that commodity price volatility shocks significantly reduce resource firms' equity prices and their demand for reproducible and natural capital. As a result of these changes in the firms' external financing costs and investment incentives, extraction costs rise, output levels and profits fall, and real GDP per capita growth slows.
Schlagwörter: 
commodity price volatility
resource based growth
simulation modeling
JEL: 
O13
Q23
Q32
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
289.14 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.