Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/57972 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 3804
Publisher: 
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich
Abstract: 
This article investigates the impact of the distribution of preferences on equilibrium behavior in conflicts that are modeled as all-pay auctions with identity-dependent externalities. In this context, we define centrists and radicals using a willingness-to-pay criterion that admits preferences more general than a simple ordering on the line. Through a series of examples, we show that substituting the auction contest success function for the lottery contest success function in a conflict may alter the relative expenditures of centrists and radicals in equilibrium. Extremism, characterized by a higher per capita expenditure by radicals than centrists, may persist and lead to a higher aggregate expenditure by radicals, even when they are relatively small in number. Moreover, we show that centrists may in the aggregate expend zero, even if they vastly outnumber radicals. Our results demonstrate the importance of the choice of the institutions of conflict, as modeled by the contest success function, in determining the role of extremism and moderation in economic, political, and social environments.
Subjects: 
conflict
all-pay auction
identity-dependent externalities
radicalism
extremism
contest success function
JEL: 
D72
D74
C72
D44
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
512.67 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.