Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/53300 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTulkens, Henryen
dc.contributor.authorSteenberghe, Vincent vanen
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T11:32:43Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T11:32:43Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53300-
dc.description.abstractThe usually assumed two categories of costs involved in climate change policy analysis, namely abatement and damage costs, hide the presence of a third category, namely adaptation costs. This dodges the determination of an appropriate level for them. Including adaptation costs explicitly in the total environmental cost function allows one to characterize the optimal (cost minimizing) balance between the three categories, in statics as well as in dynamics. Implications are derived for cost benefit analysis of adaptation expenditures.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) |cMilanoen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aNota di Lavoro |x79.2009en
dc.subject.jelQ5en
dc.subject.jelH0en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordClimate Changeen
dc.subject.keywordMitigationen
dc.subject.keywordAdaptationen
dc.subject.keywordSufferingen
dc.titleMitigation, adaptation, suffering: In search of the right mix in the face of climate change-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn646022601en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
780.91 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.