Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38866
Authors: 
Goerg, Sebastian J.
Walkowitz, Gari
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010,27
Abstract: 
In this experimental study, involving subjects from Abu-Dis (West Bank), Chengdu (China), Helsinki (Finland), and Jerusalem (Israel), we test for a presentation bias in a two-person cooperation game. In the positive frame of the game, a transfer creates a positive externality for the opposite player, and in the negative frame, a negative one. Subjects in Abu-Dis and Chengdu show a substantially higher cooperation level in the positive externality treatment. In Helsinki and Jerusalem, no framing effect is observed. These findings are also reflected in associated first-order beliefs. We argue that comparisons across subject-pools might lead to only partially meaningful and opposed conclusions if only one treatment condition is evaluated. We therefore suggest a complementary application and consideration of different presentations of identical decision problems within (cross-cultural) research on subject-pool differences.
Subjects: 
framing of decision problems
methodology
subject-pool differences
JEL: 
A13
C72
C91
F51
Z13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
530.04 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.