Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38866
Autor:innen: 
Goerg, Sebastian J.
Walkowitz, Gari
Datum: 
2010
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods No. 2010,27
Verlag: 
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
In this experimental study, involving subjects from Abu-Dis (West Bank), Chengdu (China), Helsinki (Finland), and Jerusalem (Israel), we test for a presentation bias in a two-person cooperation game. In the positive frame of the game, a transfer creates a positive externality for the opposite player, and in the negative frame, a negative one. Subjects in Abu-Dis and Chengdu show a substantially higher cooperation level in the positive externality treatment. In Helsinki and Jerusalem, no framing effect is observed. These findings are also reflected in associated first-order beliefs. We argue that comparisons across subject-pools might lead to only partially meaningful and opposed conclusions if only one treatment condition is evaluated. We therefore suggest a complementary application and consideration of different presentations of identical decision problems within (cross-cultural) research on subject-pool differences.
Schlagwörter: 
framing of decision problems
methodology
subject-pool differences
JEL: 
A13
C72
C91
F51
Z13
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
530.04 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.