Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/342337 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2026
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 446
Versionsangabe: 
Revised version, June 2026
Verlag: 
University of Zurich, Department of Economics, Zurich
Zusammenfassung: 
Democracies increasingly use censorship to counter foreign propaganda, yet evidence on its consequences remains scarce. We exploit the European Union's 2022 ban on Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik as a natural experiment, using a triple-difference design that compares users connected to the banned outlets against unconnected users in EU and non-EU countries. We analyze a daily panel of 677,780 tweets from 146,633 Twitter users in seven European countries. Pro-Russia output declines by 21.7% among connected EU users; in a difference-in-differences comparison with non-EU users, total pro-Russia output among EU users falls by 13.6%. Alternative suppliers do not fill the gap: neither their pro-Russia output nor the engagement they receive rises after the ban. Consistent with an agenda-setting role of the banned outlets, the share of EU users' tweets covering the outlets' daily top-five topics decreases by 17%. A survey experiment offers suggestive evidence that such censorship can come at a cost to the very norms it is meant to defend.
Schlagwörter: 
Censorship
Propaganda
Text-as-data
Media slant
JEL: 
D72
D78
L82
P16
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
13.04 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.