Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/341993 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2026
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers No. 26-025
Verlag: 
ZEW - Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim
Zusammenfassung: 
We revisit the employer size wage effect (ESWE) - arguably the most basic and influential departure from the law of one price for labor. Our main result is that this canonical fact disappears completely across establishments within the same firm, even though they operate in different local labor markets. We uncover and dissect this fact by including a firm fixed effect in otherwise standard cross-sectional regressions of wages on establishment size. We implement this demanding specification in population-wide triple-linked firmestablishment-employee data in Germany. This result is new to the ESWE literature (for which our paper also provides the first systematic meta-analysis). This wage-size decoupling is hard to square with the view that employment is determined along a finitely elastic employer-specific labor supply curve - i.e., employers pay exactly the minimum needed for the quantity of labor, but no more - the foundation of the monopsony view. By contrast, large multi-establishment firms (MEF) appear to hire off their labor supply curves (or those curves are very elastic), pay wage premia above the monopsonistic minimum, and leave excess labor supply. We find some evidence for a reemergence of the ESWE within lowpremium MEFs. Overall, at least for the 25% of German employment in large firms for which the ESWE disappears, wage setting and employment determination may be better accounted for by alternative models, namely accommodating above-market-clearing wage premia and rationing of labor supply, such as efficiency wage theories.
Schlagwörter: 
Employer Size Wage Effect
Multi-Establishment Firms
Wage Setting
Monopsony
JEL: 
J31
D22
L23
M50
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.41 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.