Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/335600 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] Kyklos [ISSN:] 1467-6435 [Volume:] 79 [Issue:] 1 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 218-231
Publisher: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Abstract: 
This study analyzes how individuals evaluate their peers' performance in a high‐stakes tournament in response to being randomly assigned to an age homogenous or heterogenous group using data from two TV shows. The data also allow us to explore expert evaluations because it contains objective ratings from an independent expert. Additionally, this study investigates how age‐diverse groups affect individual performance in professional golf tournaments. The results show that peer and expert evaluations as well as individual performance are lower in age‐diverse groups. Further evidence suggests that these effects occur when group members are unfamiliar but fade away once group members have gotten to know each other.
Subjects: 
Age diversity
expert evaluation
peer evaluation
performance
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.