Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/334654 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 12298
Publisher: 
Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research - CESifo GmbH, Munich
Abstract: 
This study investigates how natural disasters and federal disaster declarations influence electoral outcomes in U.S. presidential elections from 1996 to 2020. Using county-level panel data and a two-way fixed effects framework, we analyze both incumbent vote share and voter turnout to describe the mechanisms linking disasters to political accountability. We find that severe disasters significantly reduce the incumbent party's vote share, consistent with the retrospective voting hypothesis. However, Presidential Disaster Declarations (PDDs) substantially mitigate these electoral losses, particularly in politically aligned urban areas, supporting the attentive retrospection hypothesis. Disasters tend to suppress voter turnout moderately, and PDDs only partially offset this effect, suggesting that disasters primarily harm incumbents by prompting voters to switch to the opposition rather than by discouraging their supporters from participating. Categorical analyses further reveal that partisan alignment, rather than PDD issuance alone, consistently drives electoral responses. Overall, our findings highlight how institutional coordination and federal aid shape democratic accountability in the wake of natural disasters.
Subjects: 
disasters
elections
vote share
disaster declaration
U.S. county
voter turnout
JEL: 
D72
N42
O18
P16
Q54
R10
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.