Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323863 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Public Administration Review [ISSN:] 1540-6210 [Volume:] 85 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. [Place:] Hoboken, USA [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 1098-1114
Verlag: 
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., Hoboken, USA
Zusammenfassung: 
ABSTRACT A key claim of the administrative burden framework is that vulnerable citizens are more affected by administrative burden than others. We test this assumption using the life events survey in Germany, an official data record covering more than 10,000 administrative encounters involving more than 5000 citizens. We find support only for the psychological costs of perceived discrimination, whereas neither compliance nor learning costs are positively associated with vulnerability. On the contrary, some vulnerable groups perceive significantly lower learning and compliance costs. Post hoc analyses suggest that these groups might feel less exposed to bureaucracy because they use fewer sources of information. Further, the results also indicate that citizens' tolerance toward burden decreases with every additional administrative encounter and that previous research has missed an important distinction between absolute and relative burden.
Schlagwörter: 
administrative burden
administrative costs
discrimination
intersectionality
red tape
state‐citizen interactions
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
618.95 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.