Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/312094 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 11584
Publisher: 
CESifo GmbH, Munich
Abstract: 
Governments often choose deficit financing over budget cuts or tax increases to fund public goods, driven by the political unpopularity of the latter options. This study investigates the potential trade-off between maintaining prudent public finances and securing voter support by analyzing the relationship between preferences for the provision and financing of public goods. We use a survey-based discrete choice experiment with 1,808 respondents representative of the German population. Focusing on national defense as a case study, our findings reveal a strong interdependence between spending and financing preferences: individuals who highly value defense readiness and are aware of its costs tend to support deficit-neutral budgeting, favoring tax increases to finance budget expansions. Conversely, those less supportive of defense expenditure prefer debt issuance and budget consolidation, avoiding immediate cost-bearing. Additionally, preferences vary by political and sociodemographic characteristics. These results indicate that citizens' preferences are interdependent, influenced by both revenues and expenditures in the public budget. Moreover, they suggest that prudent fiscal policies aligned with public support—such as tax-based financing for defense—may be politically feasible. Policymakers can leverage these insights to design fiscal strategies that reflect voter priorities, thereby reducing the risk of electoral backlash and promoting sustainable public finances.
Subjects: 
financing public goods
public goods provision
policy preferences
non-market valuation
national defense
JEL: 
H41
H60
H56
C90
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.