Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/266754 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2022
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Public Administration Review [ISSN:] 1540-6210 [Volume:] 82 [Issue:] 6 [Publisher:] Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. [Place:] Hoboken, USA [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 986-1003
Verlag: 
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., Hoboken, USA
Zusammenfassung: 
Leadership has attracted growing attention among scholars and practitioners in public administration. With the rising availability of study results, however, it becomes increasingly difficult to keep track under which conditions leadership does or does not make a difference in the public sector. This study provides a meta‐analysis of administrative leadership and various correlates that research has theorized as outcomes of leadership. The results of a multi‐level random‐effects meta‐analysis based on 486 effect sizes from 151 studies show that correlations are stronger for the achievement of beneficial than for the prevention of detrimental outcomes, as well as for group‐ and organization‐related than for employee‐related outcomes. Moderation analyses reveal that leadership style, administrative tradition, administrative subfield, and methodological factors explain heterogeneity in effect sizes.
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.