Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/265208 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
School of Economics Discussion Papers No. 2112
Verlag: 
University of Kent, School of Economics, Canterbury
Zusammenfassung: 
This research employs two alternatively framed but formally equivalent discrete choice ex- periments that examine UK consumer preferences regarding chlorine washed chicken. One is framed in a common purchase format, the other employs a format that endows respondents with a voucher that they can use to redeem for a chicken product, or exchange, in part, for an alternative chicken product or cash. We find that the difference in our value estimates is small regardless of how we implement our choice experiment. Our analysis also differentiates the value estimates by respondent attitude to Brexit. The results reveal that being positively disposed toward Brexit means that respondents are less likely to value chlorine washed chicken negatively. Yet, of equal or greater significance, those respondents who hold positive attitudes with regard to Brexit still value EU food safety standards and quality assurance schemes such as Red Tractor highly. This suggests that attitudes to Brexit and preferences regarding food do not necessarily align in support of trade agreements that may require the UK to lower ex- isting food safety and animal welfare standards. Potential policy solutions to ensure consumer preferences are satisfied are discussed.
Schlagwörter: 
Chlorinated Chicken
Willingness to Pay
Discrete Choice Experiment
Brexit
Trade Policy
Red Tractor
JEL: 
Q18
Q17
I18
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
366.74 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.