Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/260350 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie [ISSN:] 1467-9663 [Volume:] 111 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 275-287
Verlag: 
Wiley, Hoboken
Zusammenfassung: 
The term ‘crisis’ is omnipresent. The current corona virus pandemic is perceived as the most recent example. However, the notion of crisis is increasingly deployed as a signifier of relevance, rather than as an analytical concept. Moreover, human geography has so far little contributed to the interdisciplinary crisis research field which is fixated on the temporal aspects of crisis but neglects its spatiality. Against this background, the first aim of the paper is to demonstrate the value of thinking about crisis analytically. Therefore, we introduce theoretical knowledge developed within a recently emerging literature on crisis management. Second, we demonstrate the relevance of including geographical thinking into crisis research more systematically. Based on the TPSN-framework by Jessop et al., we illustrate spatial dimensions of the ‘corona crisis’, its perception and handling in Germany. The empirical references are based on media reports.
Schlagwörter: 
crisis definition
crisis management
geography of crisis
transboundary crisis
media reports
TPSN framework
COVID-19
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version






Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.