Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25823
Authors: 
Choi, Jay Pil
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper 1778
Abstract: 
This paper investigates how different damage rules in patent infringement cases shape competition when intellectual property rights are probabilistic. I develop a simple model of oligopolistic competition to compare two main liability doctrines that have been used in the US to assess infringement damages - the unjust enrichment rule and the lost profit rule. It also points out the logical inconsistency in the concept of the reasonable royalty rates when intellectual property rights are not ironclad.
JEL: 
O3
L1
L4
D8
K4
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
299.99 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.