Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/237584
Authors: 
Samahita, Margaret
Lades, Leonhard K.
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper Series No. WP21/06
Abstract: 
Recent experimental evidence suggests that donors are averse to giving to charities with high overhead ratios. This paper asks whether donors are also averse to giving to charities spending a high share of the donations on unavoidable administrative expenses. The results of an experiment with a nationally representative sample (n = 1, 032) suggest that donors dislike paying for administrative burden almost as much as for overhead. While donors care primarily about how much of their donations are used for program-related services, donors seem to have a weak preference for charities to spend their donations on administrative burden rather than on overheads. Government subsidies that help alleviate charities' administrative burden can reduce donors' aversion to give to charities with high administrative expenses. Overall, we show that regulations that aim to increase transparency and accountability in the charity sector can have the unintended side effect of reducing charitable giving.
Subjects: 
charitable giving
administrative burden
overhead aversion
information
dictator game
online experiment
JEL: 
C99
D64
L31
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.