Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/234474 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper Series No. 35
Verlag: 
University of Waterloo, Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), Waterloo
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper analyzes the recognition of women's innovative ideas. Bibliometric data from research in economics are used to investigate gender biases in citation patterns. Based on deep learning and machine learning techniques, one can (1) establish the similarities between papers (2) build a link between articles by identifying the papers citing, cited and that should be cited. This study finds that, on average, omitted papers are 15%-20% more likely to be female-authored than male-authored. This omission bias is more prevalent when there are only males in the citing paper. Overall, to have the same level of citation as papers written by males, papers written by females need to be 20 percentiles upper in the distribution of the degree of innovativeness of the paper.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
562.53 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.