Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/224969 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CHOPE Working Paper No. 2020-10
Verlag: 
Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC
Zusammenfassung: 
In this piece I look at just one small corner of science history touching on biology, psychology and political science. I tend to agree with Paul Feyerabend's Against Method to the extent that if there is no algorithmic scientific method, then science is best understood through examples. The same is surely true of history of science: there is no template. In this article I discuss five books to illustrate three trends: a retreat from political neutrality; downplaying the truth (however assessed) of scientific claims as a reason for their acceptance; and the desire for a good story, preferably a capitalist plot.
Schlagwörter: 
Nancy MacLean
John Desmond Bernal
Naomi Oreskes
Erik Conway
Rebecca Lemov
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
345.55 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.