Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224836
Authors: 
Müller-Funk, Lea
Fröhlich, Christiane
Bank, André
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
GIGA Working Papers No. 323
Abstract: 
Between normative aspirations and national interests, forced migrants often become pawns in host states' negotiations with internal and external actors. Focusing on North Africa, the Middle East, and the Horn of Africa, this paper offers an analytical framework to better understand forced migration governance across space and time from a more global, pluralist perspective in a logic of iterative theory-building. We hypothesise that some drivers of forced migration governance are distinct from drivers of migration governance - for example, global policy and conceptions of humanitarian norms and principles play a larger role in the former. We hypothesise that while forced migration governance is negotiated around humanitarian principles, in which international actors, externalisation, and civil society play a crucial role, it also functions as a regime strategy and is driven by certain characteristics of forced migrant groups, including size and perceived identity proximity. Finally, forced migration governance is characterised by strong path dependency.
Subjects: 
migration governance
forced migration
stability
Middle East
North Africa
Horn of Africa
regime strategy
crisis
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
992.47 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.