Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/18707
Authors: 
Berger, Helge
Mueller, Till
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper 1344
Abstract: 
The likely extension of the euro area has triggered a debate on the organization of the ECB, in particular on the apparent mismatch between relative economic size and voting rights in the Council. We present a simple model of optimal representation in a federal central bank addressing this question. Optimal voting weights reflect two opposing forces: the wish to insulate common monetary policy from changing preferences at the national level, and the attempt to avoid an overly active or passive reaction to idiosyncratic national economic shocks. A perfect match between economic size and voting rights is rarely optimal, and neither is the ?one country, one vote principle?. Empirically, there are indications that the pattern of over- and under-representation of member countries in the ECB Council might be extreme by the standards of the US Fed and German Bundesbank and not always optimal.
Subjects: 
Central Bank
Federal Central Bank
Currency Union
optimal representation
voting
ECB
JEL: 
E52
D72
F33
E58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
474.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.