Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/170779
Authors: 
Biddle, Nicholas
Fels, Katja
Sinning, Mathias
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 10795
Abstract: 
This paper presents the findings of two Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that were conducted in collaboration with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). The first trial tests the effect of changes to letters (timing, social norms, color, and provision of information about charitable donations) on response rates of businesses, the timing of payments and the amount of tax debt payments. The second trial consists of two parts. The first part aims to raise awareness of the relevance of tax debt payment by changing internal guidelines used by field auditors. The second part focuses on studying the effect of changing the phone script used by desk auditors to offer assistance with payment arrangements and simplifying a follow-up letter. The findings of the first trial indicate that none of the treatments had a significant effect on any of the outcome measures considered. In contrast, the results of the second trial indicate that changing the phone script of desk auditors and simplifying the follow-up letter reduced the proportion of default assessments raised by the ATO significantly, suggesting that businesses are responsive to certain types of nudges.
Subjects: 
behavioral insights
business taxation
tax compliance
nudging
JEL: 
C93
H25
H26
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
884.53 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.