Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/146271
Authors: 
Girard, Victoire
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Working Paper 2016/74
Abstract: 
Mandated political representation over the last twenty years has had a different impact on the reporting of crime by the low castes than what is observed for the reporting of crime by women. I exploit the timing of the implementation of mandated political representation of the low castes to examine its effect on crime reports by these people. Mandated political representation of the low castes in India appears to affect the declaration of crime only for two very specific crime categories: identity-based crimes and murders. The increase in identity-based crimes (based on caste) is consistent either with better recording of existing crimes, or an increase in the incidence of committed crimes. The evolution of murders, which according to most specifications have increased after the implementation of political representation, is only consistent with an increase in incidence. This is all the more worrisome, given that the introduction of exclusive special courts, which were meant to further empower the low castes to report identity-based crimes, has not had the desired effect. A comforting observation is that crime disclosures do not increase during electoral years, contradicting the qualitative literature which points to incidents concerning reserved seats during elections. Nevertheless, mandated political representation has not had as strong an effect in giving voice to the low castes as has been documented earlier for women.
Subjects: 
crime
justice
India
inequality
caste
political reservation
political quotas
discrimination
JEL: 
D63
J15
O12
O53
ISBN: 
978-92-9256-117-8
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
812.37 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.