Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129802
Authors: 
Harrington, Joseph E.
Hüschelrath, Kai
Laitenberger, Ulrich
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers 16-025
Abstract: 
A challenge for many cartels is avoiding a destabilizing increase in non-cartel supply in response to having raised price. In the case of the German cement cartel that operated over 1991-2002, the primary source of non-cartel supply was imports from Eastern European cement manufacturers. Industry sources have claimed that the cartel sought to control imports by sharing rents with intermediaries in order to discourage them from sourcing foreign supply. Specifically, cartel members would allow an intermediary to issue the invoice for a transaction and charge a fee even though the output went directly from the cartel member's plant to the customer. We investigate this claim by first developing a theory of collusive pricing that takes account of the option of bribing intermediaries. The theory predicts that the cement cartel members are more likely to share rents with an intermediary when the nearest Eastern European plant is closer and there is more Eastern European capacity outside of the control of the cartel. Estimating a logit model that predicts when a cartel member sells through an intermediary, the empirical analysis supports both predictions.
Subjects: 
collusion
cartel
non-cartel supply
cement
distribution channels
intermediary
JEL: 
L41
K21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
296.32 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.