Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Castagnetti, Carolina
Rosti, Luisa
Töpfer, Marina
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 14-2015
This paper analyzes the effect of public-contest recruitment on earnings by applying an extended version of the Oaxaca-Blinder model with double selection to microdata on Italy. We find that the gender pay gap vanishes among public-contest selected employees, and even reverses in favor of women (-17.4%) in the young sample. The reversal is because public contests are merit-based and gender-fair screening devices. They are merit-based because selected employees possess higher productive characteristics than unselected ones, both women and men. They are gender-fair because the coefficients component in the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition is never significant among public-contest recruited employees, either with or without selection. On the contrary, among employees not hired by public contest the gender pay gap is positive and significant (7.6%), and it is entirely due to coefficients, that is to discrimination in the career path.
Gender pay gap
Public-contest recruitment
Double sample selection
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
588.58 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.