Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/121284
Authors: 
Dengler-Roscher, Kathrin
Montinari, Natalia
Panganiban, Marian
Ploner, Matteo
Werner, Benedikt
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Jena Economic Research Papers 2015-006
Abstract: 
How malleable are people´s fairness ideals? Although fairness is an oft-invoked concept in allocation situations, it is still unclear whether and to what extent people´s allocations reflect their fairness ideals. We investigate in a laboratory experiment whether people´s fairness ideals vary with respect to changes in the order in which they undertake two allocation tasks. Participants first generate resources in a real-effort task and then distribute them. In the partial allocation task, the participant determines the earnings for himself and another participant. In the impartial allocation task, the participant determines the earnings for two other participants. We also manipulate the participants´ experience, i.e, whether they took part in similar allocation experiments before. We find that participants are more likely to allocate more resources to themselves than what they earned in the real-effort task when they decide partially. Exclusively for inexperienced participants, deciding impartially first dampens selfish behavior when they decide partially.
Subjects: 
dictator
fairness
fairness bias
impartial spectators
partial stakeholders
proportionality principle
JEL: 
C72
C91
D63
D64
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.