Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/108805 
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 5255
Publisher: 
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich
Abstract: 
Using a household production model of educational choices, we characterise a free market situation in which some agents (high wagers) educate their children full-time and spend a sizable amount of resources on them, while others (low wagers) educate them only partially. The free-market equilibrium is iniquitous, both because the households have different resources and because the children have different access to education. Public policy is thus called for, for vertical as well as horizontal equity purposes. Conventional wisdom has it that both objectives could be achieved using price control instruments, i.e. income taxes and price subsidies. We find instead that income taxes reduces equality of opportunity and that price subsidies cannot remedy this. Quantity controls become necessary: a compulsory education package, financed by a redistributive tax system, achieves both types of equity. Redistributive taxation and compulsory education are therefore best seen as complementary policies.
Subjects: 
education
in-kind transfers
redistributive taxation
JEL: 
H42
H52
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.