Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/108684 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2015
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 8806
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
The Mortensen and Pissarides (1994) matching model with all wages negotiated each period is shown inconsistent with macroeconomic wage dynamics in the US. This applies even when heterogeneous match productivities, time to build vacancies and credible bargaining are incorporated. Wage rigidity consistent with micro evidence that wages of job changers are more flexible than those of job stayers allows the model to capture these dynamics and is not inconsistent with parameter calibrations in the literature. Such wage rigidity affects only the timing of wage payments over the duration of matches, so conclusions about characteristics based on calibrations continue to apply.
Schlagwörter: 
matching frictions
wage bargaining
wage rigidity
JEL: 
E2
J3
J6
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
271.95 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.