Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/107387
Authors: 
Costa-i-Font, Joan
De-Albuquerque, Filipe
Doucouliagos, Hristos
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper 5212
Abstract: 
A growing literature documents the existence of strategic political reactions to public expenditure in one jurisdiction on either neighboring or reference jurisdictions. The latter might give raise to downward expenditure spiral, or race to the bottom . However, in ascertaining the empirical triggers of such a process evidence is suggestive of markedly heterogeneous findings. Most of such heterogeneity can be traced back to study design and institutional differences. This paper contributes to the literature by applying meta-regression analysis to quantify the size and the direction of strategic inter-jurisdictional expenditure interactions controlling for study and institutional characteristics. We find several robust results beyond confirming that jurisdictions do engage in strategic expenditure interactions; namely that (i) interactions are weakening over time; (ii) strategic interactions are stronger among municipalities than among intermediate levels of government; and (iii) strategic interactions appear to emerge from tax competition rather than yardstick competition, with capital controls and fiscal decentralization shaping the magnitude of fiscal interactions. Hence, we conclude political decentralization structures that draw upon the political agency (yardstick competition) does not necessarily engender a race to the bottom'.
Subjects: 
inter-jurisdictional competition
yardstick competition
meta-regression
expenditure competition
JEL: 
H10
H50
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.