Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 09-17
Publisher: 
University of California, Department of Economics, Davis, CA
Abstract: 
Contrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure.
Subjects: 
revealed preference
theory of choice
neuroeconomics
non-choice evidence
machines
JEL: 
A12
B41
C80
C90
D60
D80
D87
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
153.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.