Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Gutiérrez S., Francisco
Gutiérrez, María Teresa
Guzmán, Tania
Arenas, Juan Carlos
Pinto, María Teresa
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Working paper // World Institute for Development Economics Research 2011,26
This paper evaluates transformative policy innovations with respect to security and taxation in the three main Colombian cities: Bogotá, Medellín, and Cali. In the first two, such policies were associated with huge success. Elsewhere we (Gutiérrez et al. 2009) have tagged these transformation processes as 'urban/metropolitan miracles'. The term comes from the fact that both common citizens and pundits considered these to be extremely unlikely, that they were fast, and that they were large-scale. We argue, that the success of Bogotá and Medellín was the result of a set of institutional underpinnings basically related to the 1991 constitution; the opening of a window of opportunity for new political actors; and, as a result, the formation of a new government coalition and 'governance formula'. Anti-particularism was a language related to political demands - linked organically with the pro-1991 constitution movement - which became effective because it matched the crucial strategic concerns of heterogeneous constituencies with respect to security and state-building. It was the cement holding together the coalitions that allowed large-scale urban transformation, and it tamed the opposition of the rich because it was issued as the solution their (and everyone else's) collective action problems.
urban security
state building
public policies
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
111.18 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.