Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/98212 
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 1035
Publisher: 
Yale University, Economic Growth Center, New Haven, CT
Abstract: 
We estimate the general-equilibrium labor market effects of a large-scale randomized intervention in which we designed and marketed a rainfall index insurance product across three states in India. Marketing agricultural insurance to both cultivators and to agricultural wage laborers allows us to test a general-equilibrium model of wage determination in settings where households supplying labor and households hiring labor face weather risk. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find that both labor demand and equilibrium wages become more rainfall sensitive when cultivators are offered rainfall insurance, because insurance induces cultivators to switch to riskier, higher-yield production methods. The same insurance contract offered to agricultural laborers smoothes wages across rainfall states by inducing changes in labor supply. Policy simulations based on our estimates suggest that selling insurance only to land-owning cultivators and precluding the landless from the insurance market (which is the current regulatory practice in India and other developing countries), makes wage laborers worse off relative to a situation where insurance does not exist at all. The general-equilibrium analysis reveals that the welfare costs of current regulation are borne by landless laborers, who represent the poorest segment of society and whose risk management options are the most limited.
Subjects: 
Index insurance
Agricultural Wages
General Equilibrium Effects
JEL: 
O17
O13
O16
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
347.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.