Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/92694
Authors: 
Ishida, Junichiro
Matsushima, Noriaki
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
ISER Discussion Paper, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University 757
Abstract: 
It is often argued, though mostly informally, that outward foreign direct investment (FDI) is a synonym for the export of employment and thus detrimental to the home economy. To see whether and under what conditions this intuition indeed holds true, we construct a model of unionized duopoly and examine welfare implications of outward FDI by paying special attention to the role of domestic competition. We find that the welfare effect of FDI is largely non-monotonic, and there are indeed such things as 'excessive FDI.' We also show that, when FDI reduces welfare, this negative effect arises more at the expense of consumers rather than the unions: in fact, quite contrary to the popular belief, FDI may actually benefit the unions because it serves to soften price competition between them. The paper points out that welfare effects of outward FDI hinges crucially on the nature of domestic competition, and policymakers must carefully take this aspect into consideration.
Subjects: 
R&D investment
vertical relation
transport cost
welfare
wage bargaining
JEL: 
F21
J31
L13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
240.67 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.