Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/88643 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Research Papers in Economics No. 5/13
Publisher: 
Universität Trier, Fachbereich IV – Volkswirtschaftslehre, Trier
Abstract: 
This paper analyzes the distortions of health insurers’ benefit packages due to adverse selection when there is imperfect competition. Within a discrete choice setting with two risk types, the following main results are derived: For intermediate levels of competition, the benefit packages of both risk types are distorted in the separating equilibrium. As the level of competition decreases, the distortion decreases for the low risk type, but increases for the high risk type; in addition, the number of insurers offering the benefit package for the low risk type increases. If the level of competition is low enough, a pooling equilibrium emerges, which generally differs from the Wilson-equilibrium. It is shown that these results have important implications for risk adjustment: For intermediate levels of competition, risk adjustment can be ineffective or even decrease welfare if it is not reasonably precise.
Subjects: 
Adverse selection
discrete choice
risk adjustment
JEL: 
I18
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
804.9 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.