Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Kim, Hugh H.
Maurer, Raimond
Mitchell, Olivia S.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
CFS Working Paper 2013/08
We investigate the theoretical impact of including two empirically-grounded insights in a dynamic life cycle portfolio choice model. The first is to recognize that, when managing their own financial wealth, investors incur opportunity costs in terms of current and future human capital accumulation, particularly if human capital is acquired via learning by doing. The second is that we incorporate age-varying efficiency patterns in financial decisionmaking. Both enhancements produce inactivity in portfolio adjustment patterns consistent with empirical evidence. We also analyze individuals' optimal choice between self-managing their wealth versus delegating the task to a financial advisor. Delegation proves most valuable to the young and the old. Our calibrated model quantifies welfare gains from including investment time and money costs, as well as delegation, in a life cycle setting.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
622.82 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.