Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/86528
Authors: 
van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M.
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 07-019/3
Abstract: 
Expectations and information about the growth of GDP per capita have a large influence on decisions made by private and public economic agents. It will be argued here that GDP (per capita) is far from a robust indicator of social welfare, and that its use as such must be regarded as a serious form of market and government failure. This article presents an update on the most important criticisms of GDP as an indicator of social welfare and economic progress. It further examines the nature and extent of the impact of GDP information on the economy, revisits the customary arguments in favour of the GDP indicator, and critically evaluates proposed alternatives to GDP. The main conclusion is that it is rational to dismiss GDP as an indicator to monitor economic progress and to guide public policy. As is clarified, this conclusion does not imply a plea against growth, innovation or national accounting.
Subjects: 
Distribution
externalities
genuine savings
happiness
HDI
informal sector
ISEW
status goods
JEL: 
D31
D63
E01
I31
O15
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
267.41 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.