Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/85721
Authors: 
Audretsch, D.B.
Klomp, Luuk
Thurik, A.R.
Year of Publication: 
1998
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 98-012/3
Abstract: 
A large literature has emerged focusing on the post-entry performance of firms and, in particular, on thelinks between firm growth, survival, size and age. While these studies have resulted in findings that aresufficiently consistent as to constitute Stylized Facts, virtually all of these studies are based onmanufacturing. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap in knowledge about the role of non-manufacturing in industrial organization, and in particular, in the post-entry performance of firms, orwhat happens to firms subsequent to entering an industry. We suggest theoretical reasons why therelationships between firm age and size on the one hand, and survival and growth on the other may, infact, not be the same in services as they are for manufacturing. We use a longitudinal data base forDutch firms in the retail and hotel and catering sectors to identify around 13,000 new-firm start-ups and47,000 incumbents in the services and track them over subsequent years. We are then able test to seewhether the Stylized Results identified based on manufacturing still hold in the services. The resultssuggest that the most fundamental relationships between firm size, age, survival and growth arestrikingly different for services than for manufacturing. In terms of the dynamics of industrialorganization, services may, in fact, not simply mirror the manufacturing sector.
Subjects: 
Services
Survival
Growth
JEL: 
L8
L0
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
94.62 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.