Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/82845
Authors: 
Ohlsson, Henry
Year of Publication: 
1998
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper, Department of Economics, Uppsala University 1998:6
Abstract: 
Many comparisons of the performance of public and private producers use a public/private ownership dummy variable to capture cost differences in cross section data. This is appropriate if the producer choice is random. The dummy variable model is, however, logically inconsistent if the producer choice depends on cost differences. If cost differences do not matter for choice, there is still a risk for selectivity bias if there are other variables affecting the producer choice. I compare public and private enterprises using refuse collection costs in 115 Swedish municipalities. The data cover 170 enterprises. First, I find that cost differences do not affect producer choice. Second, producer choice is important for costs. Third, the cost advantage found for private firms using the dummy variable model disappears when choice is taken into account. Fourth, the parameters of the cost functions differ between private and public firms.
Subjects: 
public ownership
private ownership
competitive tendering
contracting out
cost minimization
switching regression model with endogenous switching
privatization
JEL: 
D24
E22
L32
L33
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
190.29 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.