Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/79296
Authors: 
Dias, MonicaCosta
Ichimura, Hidehiko
van den Berg, Gerard J.
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
cemmap working paper, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice CWP33/07
Abstract: 
The matching method for treatment evaluation does not balance selective unobserved differences between treated and non-treated. We derive a simple correction term if there is an instrument that shifts the treatment probability to zero in specific cases. Policies with eligibility restrictions,where treatment is impossible if some variable exceeds a certain value, provide a natural application. In an empirical analysis, we first examine the performance of matching versus regression-discontinuity estimation in the sharp age-discontinuity design of the NDYP job search assistance program for young unemployed in the UK. Next, we exploit the age eligibility restriction in the Swedish Youth Practice subsidized work program for young unemployed, where compliance is imperfect among the young. Adjusting the matching estimator for selectivity changes the results towards ineffectiveness of subsidized work in moving individuals into employment.
Subjects: 
propensity score , policy evaluation , treatment effect , regression discontinuity , selection , job search assistance , subsidized work , youth unemployment
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
312.83 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.